All
musicians love music. I’m a musician. So it is deduced that I love music.
Here’s another one: All girls like One Direction. I’m a girl. Ergo, I like One
Direction. What? Yes, I am indeed a girl. But just because the majority of the
female population is illogically obsessed with the cluster of
genetically-gifted males who might acquire some sort of vocal chords, that does
not necessarily mean I myself am part of that mindless mass. For those of you
who are unaware as to who One Direction is exactly, it’s rather best that you
do not know. Basically, the examples I gave in the beginning are a form of
Deduction: logic that uses a commonplace to reach a conclusion, interpreting
the circumstances through a lens of beliefs and values, basically a more
interesting use of syllogisms. An enthymeme is a logic technique that shortens
deduction to where it just places a commonplace and a conclusion together: All
musicians love music. I love music. In this enthymeme, it is pretty obvious
that I am a musician without actually stating it. Another would be: All girls
like One Direction. I like One Direction. It is then correctly assumed that I
am a girl. Of course, not always are enthymemes going to be factual. The
enthymeme that goes: “Babes go for Priapic owners. You should buy a Priapic,”
basically states very matter-of-factly that women, all women, go for men who
have said car. But some women don’t even know that car exists. Some women might
even be terrorized by a Priapic because it was their young-self’s transportation
to ballet practice where they would get bullied because of her very
epileptic-shock-like dance moves. The advertisers didn’t have those women in
mind. Obviously.
Induction
works in quite the opposite way, using argument by example. If I want to make sure
my audience knows that I like One Direction, I would first make it a point to
state how I have all of their CDs. With that example, they could deduct that I
like said band. I own a guitar and I usually play drums, piano, and base in
jazz bars. From that, then, you can deduct that I am a musician. Fact,
Comparison, and Story are also useful. I want to convince my friend to go to
the library instead of the Norah Jones concert. I would say:
Fact: You
always tell me you love to read and drink coffee on Saturdays.
If that
doesn’t work out:
Comparison:
Do you think they let you drink coffee in the music room?
If not:
Story: You
know that two weeks ago a man felt so suffocated and claustrophobic in the
small-roomed concert that he died due to lack of oxygen?
A Norah
Jones concert would actually be a tough choice, although I think I’d decidedly
choose the concert. I love the library and all, but some things just stand out
more in life. Like soothing voices that caress my flesh like flowery soap.
Either way, just knowing I could convince someone to do such a thing, such as
pick a bookstore over a Norah Jones concert, is amazing. If I could actually
get it to work, I mean.
Isa, the fact that you used One Direction (cultural phenomena, duh) in your blog is hilarious. I, myself actually love them but see no problem with you using them as an example since it actually works. The fact that you're actually able to mix a boy band with enthylmeme's is funny since both of them never mix together. xx.
ReplyDeleteI have no idea what that One Direction is, but I agree with Isa about its ingenuity. I do know who Norah Jones is however.
ReplyDeleteModern life is filled with rhetoric. It's everywhere!
I like your approach here. Keep up the variety.