There
is something that stands out when every time a character is mentioned, they’re
doing the exact same thing they were doing before. Always. This is the case for
Egger’s father:
“Through
the family room window, in the middle of the white silver screen, my father was
in his suit, a grey suit, dressed for work…. He did not move. His suit, even
with him kneeling, leaning forward, was loose on his shoulders and back. He had
lost so much weight. “
This
paragraph is placed in its own private strand of square page. By that I mean to
say that there are three wide spaces between the paragraph preceding this one
and also the one that follows it. Almost like a sudden thought in your
conscience, so abrupt and placed between to abruptly in between because it’s that
noteworthy. And it is. Here we have Eggers exposing some random, concise, and
yet powerful dialogue between him and his brother Toph and then Bam, this
paragraph is alone with too much space for itself. The image is heartbreaking.
The suit itself is just a great detail to perfectly capture the idea of a
working man, ruffled and tired, getting home only to kneel forward, like people
bowing down in exhaustion or in deference, clad in duress. The mere detail of
the suit’s looseness on his figure shows his apparent instability, how he isn’t
exactly steady. The statement about his having lost so much weight just
highlights the suffering of something that manages to even deprive you of you
appetite. One paragraph and it is so apparent that his wife’s disease is not
only killing her, it’s killing him.
About
ten pages later and the same type of random paragraph appears, isolated,
mentioning the father once again:
“
My father had not moved. He was about ten feet from the street. He was
kneeling, but with his hands on the ground, fingers extended down, like roots
from a riverbed tree. He was not praying. His head tilted back for a moment as
he looked up, not to the sky, but to the trees in the neighbour’s backyard. He
was still on his knees.”
What
is interesting about this is the time span between these two paragraphs. Eggers
places a lot of material in between the two so when the reader comes by the
father, still in the sameness of before, it makes you halt. The fact that so
many things have happened and the father is still there emphasises the lack of
time, highlighting his actions. If it were not for this repetition of sorts,
the reader would, sure, take into account the father and his suit, but
eventually forget. This last paragraph brings the reader back to the father, in
the dame position, but with his hands on the ground almost as if trying to dig
up anything worthwhile, trying to grasp the metaphorical treasure that will
bring him happiness. Trying to find anything. It’s depressing. His suffering is
obvious and one wonders about how his life will pan out. One might even infer
that he will probably fly up to heaven with Egger’s mother as well.
And
he does. Eggers starts out two pages later by saying, “ You should have seen my
father’s service.” So, of course, he died. It’s interesting how said fact is
unknown until after the paragraph about his father’s funeral. This is a great
example of how Dave Eggers manages to visibly show the abruptness of his
father’s death via the abruptness of is prose. The news, to say the least, is
sudden to the reader in apparently the same way it was to Eggers. Later he
proceeds to actually explain and speak of his dad when he was in the road to
dying (that sounds odd) and describes how “I did not know that last time I saw
my father would be the last time I would see my father.” His father was in
intensive care and when Eggers entered his room, he was sprawled on the bed,
cigarette in hand, “grinning like he had won the biggest award there ever was.”
Am I the only one that finds that disturbing? The guy just been diagnosed with
God-knows what and he’s smirking, a mocking smile plastered on his face? I
guess after all the suffering in thinking of his wife’s impending death, he
just realized dying with her was the perfect solution.
It’s
sad. What’s even sadder is the way Egger writes it. No, his tone is not
borderline dramatic and lugubrious stuffed. His tone is actually pretty dry,
ironic, humorous. The fact that his tone is anything but sad is a tool he uses
to distance himself. It is the means by which he copes and is able to retell
what to him must be a really painful experience. But he does it this way
because he can, and even then, that he does with that type of diction makes the
reader feel even more. The way he is obviously detracting himself from said occurrence
makes his story all the more real and all the more touching. He could have
decided to display the tragedy of his life by aiming for pity and resorting to
deep metaphors of his withered soul and frayed heart. But he didn’t. His
diction is what makes A Heartbreaking
work of Staggering Genius the work
that it is: Darkly humorous, self-satirizing, and hilariously tragic.
No comments:
Post a Comment